Onaiyekan’s silence might be louder than Bwala’s statement
Has Aso Rock heard enough about who’s ‘political’ and who isn’t? Apparently not, because the presidency is now lecturing a cardinal on the difference. Turns out there is a way to disagree with a cardinal, and there is a way to try to “correct” him. Last week, the Tinubu presidency chose the second option and in doing so, might have handed Cardinal John Onaiyekan a bigger platform, a cleaner moral high ground, and a headache that a little subtlety would have avoided entirely.
On July 28, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria met President Tinubu at the State House to lay out its assessment of the economy and security. By their account, the country was “bleeding,” the poor were not feeling any recovery. The president pushed back hard, insisting the numbers were telling a different story. Three days later, Onaiyekan went on television and said what the official version left out. Now that should have been the end of an ordinary news cycle: a respected bishop offering a read —albeit uncomfortable on the state of the nation, the kind of thing bishops’ conferences do in most democracies without triggering a constitutional crisis.
However, the presidency responded. Special Adviser Daniel Bwala didn’t just contest the substance of Onaiyekan’s claims he actually went after the man’s motives, calling him “more political than spiritual” and tying his remarks to opposition figure Peter Obi and the 2023 election.
A second aide, Temitope Ajayi, accused the cardinal of breaching the privacy of the meeting and called his TV appearance “an abuse of clerical privilege.” Two different officials, two different lines of attack, both viciously targeting the messenger rather than the message. This is where the miscalculation becomes visible. Onaiyekan is not a random man the presidency can out-argue on a talk show. He is a former Archbishop of Abuja with decades of unquestionable moral authority. Painting him as one machiavellian Obi operative doesn’t diminish him, it makes the presidency look weak and, worse, makes it look like it cannot tell the difference between a partisan critic and a cleric doing his duty. Nigerians who might never have paid attention to a bishops’ conference were suddenly watching a fight between the government and a cardinal.
The aftermath confirms the strategy backfired.
Onaiyekan didn’t apologize, clarify, or try to soften his position under pressure. He simply stopped engaging and telling the presidency, in effect, that the bishops were done talking and it was now on the government to govern better. A cleric declining to dignify the attack with a rebuttal, was its own kind of rebuke.
None of this means the bishops’ economic diagnosis was necessarily correct, or that a government has no right to push back on criticism it considers unfair. Disagreement wasn’t remotely problem. The problem was reaching immediately for delegitimization, questioning whether a cardinal was allowed to speak, whose interests he “really” represented, whether he’d violated some unwritten rule of clerical etiquette instead of engaging with the claim that ordinary Nigerians aren’t feeling the recovery the government keeps announcing.
The presidency’s defenders might argue Onaiyekan broke protocol first by publicizing a private meeting, that Bwala was factually correct about the Catholic Church’s institutional lean toward Obi in 2023, and that a government facing sustained opposition criticism from religious leaders has a legitimate interest in understanding who’s speaking and why. Whether that justifies going after the cardinal’s motives rather than his points is the judgment call at the center of this piece reasonable people can land differently on it.
That instinct, more than any insult, is the actual story here, and it’s a pattern worth watching as the 2027 campaign heats up: a communications operation that treats criticism as a threat to be neutralized rather than as a question to be answered.
The views expressed here are the author’s alone and do not represent the official policy or position of the company.
