JAMB Launches Urgent Review of 2025 UTME Amid Widespread Complaints
The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has initiated an urgent review of the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) process in response to a surge of complaints from candidates nationwide.
The examination body, which released the 2025 UTME results last Friday, confirmed it has received an “unusual volume” of complaints, primarily centred on discrepancies in candidates’ scores.
In a statement released Monday, JAMB announced it is accelerating its annual post-exam system audit, typically conducted months after the examination, due to the rising public outcry. The review will cover the entire UTME process, including registration, examination administration, and result computation.
“As part of our commitment to fairness and transparency, we are fast-tracking our system review to ensure every stage of the UTME process meets the highest standards,” the board said.
During the exam phase, JAMB emphasised that every candidate was allowed to take the test, and any candidate affected by technical issues was promptly rescheduled.
To bolster the review process, the board is collaborating with top industry experts, including representatives from the Computer Professionals Association of Nigeria, chief external examiners from tertiary institutions, and members of the Educational Association and Research Network in Africa.
“If any glitches are uncovered, appropriate remedial actions will be taken swiftly,” JAMB assured.
The move comes amid mounting frustration among students and parents, with many turning to social media to question the accuracy of the released results. A significant number of candidates—over 8,000, according to reports—have formally lodged complaints citing technical issues during the exam.
Some students have outrightly rejected their results, insisting they do not reflect their true performance.
JAMB spokesperson Dr. Fabian Benjamin responded to the backlash, stating that the published results represent the candidates’ actual performance.
However, the statistics paint a concerning picture: more than 78 per cent of candidates scored below 200 marks out of a possible 400, triggering broader discussions about exam integrity and preparation standards.
As investigations continue, JAMB has asked for public patience and reiterated its dedication to upholding the UTME’s credibility.
“We are committed to addressing any valid issues and ensuring that the sanctity of the examination process remains intact,” the board said.
